As far as I am concerned, r3340 is a reasonable solution.

Not every link has to be underlined for people to know it a link.  
Common sense allows people to figure out that a UI element is usually  
a link.

Links in text should be differentiated. They now are.

As far as I am concerned, the current implementation is fine for  
dashboard modules is fine. It's a nice little additional functionality  
for "power" users.

If you don't know the headings are links, it doesn't hurt you and the  
interface works fine. If you figure out they are, you find a nice  
little set of shortcuts.

I think any net user is familiar with the idea of not all links being  
underlined. A plethora of popular sites don't underline obvious links,  
yet people use them fine.

Human beings aren't robots. We have brains which allow us to reason  
that headings and ui elements are links.

On Mar 18, 2009, at 12:50 PM, Matthias Bauer wrote:

>
> Matt Read wrote:
>
>> I'm not saying all hyperlinks _have_ to be underlined, in fact I'm  
>> not
>> talking about 'links' here. But you should be able to glance at a  
>> page
>> and see what is _clickable_, which is true for 70% of the habari  
>> admin
>> right now. I know we are making a web "application", but it's still  
>> the
>> web, and people expect it to behave as such.
>>
>> So I'd love to hear any thoughts anyone has.
>
> From r3340 on, links in plugin descriptions etc., where they are not  
> UI
> elements, but in-content links, are underlined. As far as I'm  
> concerned,
> r3340 fixes ticket #905 pretty well. The only thing that's  
> inconsistent
> is dashboard module headers with and without links, where I'd suggest
> not linking module headers in any case, but instead have an optional
> 'more' link.
>
> Did you give r3340+ a spin? Does it meet your expectations UI-wise?
>
> -Matt
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to