2009/7/7 Huan "KDE Zealot" Truong <[email protected]>:
> Eh,
>
> I'm using xvnkb. Freaking rock solid and fast. Works equally well on
> Gnome and KDE.
>
> Bonus: You don't have to mess around with stupid scim/skim on KDE.
> Doesn't look nice but what the hell, it just works, and is fast, and
> doesn't require you press enter twice on every message you type on the
> IM client, and doesn't underline every freaking word you type, and
> doesn't prevent you from typing Vietnamese when you switch the app
> with Alt+TAB. I actually tried to investigate into the ibus crap and
> it's even more horrible than scim/skim.
>
> Pull it from CVS, the annoying power consumption bug has just been
> fixed - great deal for laptop users. The author actually listened to
> his users.
>
> Whatever.

I don't agree, X Server already has its own IM method, while hack it
like xvnkb does? (hooking into the server) It will cause a lot of
problem doing so, I haven't used it but I have heard it has problem
with GIMP, CD driver.

And for your problem with scim/skim, just disable pre-edit,
application edit method sharing in FrontEnd global setup.

Aside from ABI transistion problem, I see there is no real reason not
to use scim. (this is why ibus was born).

PS: Its GUI is badly designed too, but that is another story.
_______________________________________________
POST RULES : http://wiki.hanoilug.org/hanoilug:mailing_list_guidelines
_______________________________________________
HanoiLUG mailing lists: http://lists.hanoilug.org/
HanoiLUG wiki: http://wiki.hanoilug.org/
HanoiLUG blog: http://blog.hanoilug.org/

Trả lời cho