пн, 16 мар. 2020 г. в 14:54, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > > Ilya, > > > > Am 16.03.20 um 07:52 schrieb ???? ???????: > > > we use clang because of its address sanitizer. I found gcc asan more > noisy > > > and less usable. > > > > I believe you broke ASAN with clang-9 anyway, because the Travis > > configuration checks for 'clang': > > > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/blob/67b095e797a156ae27b7b52f6ccf57171717dd16/.travis.yml#L108 > > > > It probably needs to read `if [ "$CC" = "clang*" ]` (unless I got my > > bash syntax wrong). > > Indeed. However it should be: > > if [ "${CC%-*}" = "clang" ] >
it did not indicate any error. so it looked ok :) > > I'd like to focus on what's still broken (i.e. the abns seamless reload > test) > before adding more noise. It ought to be fixed but it is still random, it > even failed once on amd64. I definitely need to be able to reproduce it, as > I was certain the two recent bugs fixed were the only ones responsible for > this. > sure > > Willy >
