btw, is there some tool to test at least RFC 7230 compliance ?

also, there are various specific implementation like MAPI / MS RPC which
might require some testing tool as well

inspired by h2spec actually. can/should we add some HTTP/1.1 tests as well ?

ср, 25 мар. 2020 г. в 11:02, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>:

> Hi guys,
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 01:42:14AM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> (...)
> > > Hope you have an idea where to look. Providing captures/logs is a bit
> > > difficult without some careful scrubbing..
>
> I think a good test would be to just revert that patch, or selectively
> each one of the 3 lines it contains.
>
> > No answer yet, but I just tried to do a checkout of the FreeBSD svn tree
> > via haproxy, and it indeed doesn't work, it's a bit late right now, but
> > I'll have a look tomorrow :)
>
> OK thanks. I remember that you had some opinions on some of them at some
> point. However I'm tempted to think that if any of them needs to be
> changed,
> we're probably missing something somewhere which could indicate that other
> subscribes might randomly fail, because each time it's in h1_detach() and
> I don't see why we should always wake up if already subscribed.
>
> Thanks,
> Willy
>
>

Reply via email to