Lorenzo, > I can't understand why "wasting" and event like 1.0 with > a simply "stable release" : > 1.0 need to be "revolutionary" or at least be comparable > feature by feature with other similar solutions and be better > on many of them
Harbour 1.0 goal was/is to be the best Cliper 5.2 compatibe open source multi-platform product. With emphasis on the compatibility. No one said that MT is not important, as I guess it is planned for future versions. But since Clipper 5.x does not have MT, this feature is not essential for 1.0 If both Przemek and Viktor said it should be added after 1.0, I trust that they know what they are saying, as not many people grasp the amount of work needed to do it, and the free time they are willing to spare to implement this. Chen. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
