Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 6:25:56 PM, Eli wrote: > I think you have that backwards. MS ships 6 months earlier so doesn't have > the advantage of using technology that is 6th months better.
> BTW, I agree Sony was more impressive but going by the web page they don't > really have any PS3 code up yet so more likely to be vaporware. > Eli First isn't always best. Ask the Dreamcast. And the Fight Night, Unreal 3 and all the internal tech demos were all running live, in real time on the Cell plus GPU. May have been 6800 Ultra SLI rather than RSX though. There was a guy over at Quatertothree.com who talked a little bit about development he's involved with on the PS3. They've been writing code for the Cell for about a year. A lot of the Xbox demos were prerenderes too, though. Sony's just looked better when they fibbed! The Motor Storm and Killzone 2 demos looked absolutely sick, and the Square demo of the FFVII intro look fantastic too. Kinda put the FFXI+ demo they gave MS to shame. Brad Grenz --the Widgets http://www.thewidgets.com
