On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
4) WS vs 4:3
These WS LCDs seem to offer less vertical real estate with increased
horizontal space. However, two 4:3s running at 1600 x 1200 offer way
more horizontal space than even the largest WS that is affordable. Do
any of you prefer dual 4:3s vs either dual WS or just a big WS? I'm
just wondering what's the best way to go if I end up buying a new LCD to
deal with the problems mentioned above.
Some of the Dell Widescreens can be turned and rearranged 9:16 instead of
16:9, and I think 2 of those side by side would be great.
Christopher Fisk
--
We're living in a world where even a banana can get you high. The law
simply doesn't do enough to stop these things from happening.
-- dushkin
