At 02:30 -0700 98/10/16, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: >Another approach is to compete not head-to-head on speed, but on >cunning. Get a good library of numeric procedures (e.g. Mathlab), ... Note that it is "MatLab", short for "Matrix Laboratory". >...interface them to Haskell, and use Haskell as the glue code to make >it really fast to write complex numerical algorithms. 99% of the >time will still be spent in the library, so the speed of the Haskell >implementation is not very important. This looks like a jolly productive >line to me. In addition, this method might give clues on how Haskell might be extended. Hans Aberg * Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/> * AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Matthew Donadio
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jeffrey R. Lewis
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Simon Peyton-Jones
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Thorsten Zoerner
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Dave Tweed
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? David Barton
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Olivier . Lefevre
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Matthew Donadio
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Dave Tweed
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? R.S. Nikhil
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Rod Price
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jeremy D. Frens
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Alex Ferguson