> At 14:36 -0500 98/10/09, Jan Skibinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could Haskell ever be used for serious scientific computing? ... >On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Hans Aberg wrote: > I think you need to define "scientific computing": At 09:57 -0500 >98/10/14, Jan Skibinski wrote: > I do not think it is possible to clearly define the phrase. > It may mean different things to different people. Specifically, I think one would need to specify some different categories, each with a well-focused computing profile. Each category may then require a different set of solutions. Hans Aberg * Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/> * AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>
- Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Haskell in Scientific Computing? Steve Stevenson
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Chris Angus
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Matthew Donadio
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jeffrey R. Lewis
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Simon Peyton-Jones
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Thorsten Zoerner
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Dave Tweed
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? David Barton
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Olivier . Lefevre
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Matthew Donadio
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Dave Tweed