At 02:30 -0700 98/10/16, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: >Declarative languages *ought* to give a big handle on optimisation. >FORTRAN compilers spend a lot of time deriving a functional program >from the imperative one they started with, but they have to make >conservative approximations. So in principle we might do better. Exactly what does this mean that FORTRAN compilers derives a functional program? Hans Aberg * Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/> * AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Chris Angus
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Matthew Donadio
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jeffrey R. Lewis
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Simon Peyton-Jones
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Thorsten Zoerner
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Dave Tweed
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? David Barton
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Olivier . Lefevre
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Matthew Donadio
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Dave Tweed
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? R.S. Nikhil
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Rod Price
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jeremy D. Frens
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski