Hans Aberg wrote: > At 14:36 -0500 98/10/09, Jan Skibinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Could Haskell ever be used for serious scientific computing? > > I think you need to define "scientific computing": There is usually a > tradeoff between runtime abstraction/generality and speed. Haskell provides > some generality on the expense of speed. > > Haskell could probably be made more usable by allowing classes be written > in another language and used from Haskell or vice versa. One of the projects that I'm currently working on is an interface to MATLAB using h/direct. That would give you access to a high quality matrix library from Haskell. It's quite incomplete in its current state, but I would gladly make it available to those interested in exploring the possibilities. --Jeff
- Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Haskell in Scientific Computing? Steve Stevenson
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Chris Angus
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Matthew Donadio
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Jeffrey R. Lewis
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Simon Peyton-Jones
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Thorsten Zoerner
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Dave Tweed
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Hans Aberg
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? David Barton
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Olivier . Lefevre
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Matthew Donadio
- Re: Haskell in Scientific Computing? Dave Tweed
- RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing? R.S. Nikhil