help-make  

Messages by Thread

• Weird (and convenient) difference between cygwin and DOS Mason
  • Re: Weird (and convenient) difference between cygwin and DOS Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Weird (and convenient) difference between cygwin and DOS Mason
  • Re: Weird (and convenient) difference between cygwin and DOS Greg Chicares
  • Re: Weird (and convenient) difference between cygwin and DOS David Boyce
  • Re: Weird (and convenient) difference between cygwin and DOS Eli Zaretskii
• auto-dependency issues Leo
  • Re: auto-dependency issues Greg Chicares
• VPATH vs vpath - variable expansion Saurabh T
• topological sort Stefan Monnier
• make --debug=basic reports prerequisites do not exist but they do Mark Galeck (CW)
• root makefile.debug (How to call inner library config.in) lucky7456969
  • Re: root makefile.debug (How to call inner library config.in) lucky7456969
  • Re: root makefile.debug (How to call inner library config.in) Paul Smith
• Why Make is calling my perl lib lucky7456969
• Help on Makefile lucky7456969
  • Re: Help on Makefile Paul Smith
• how to improve compactness? Matej Košík
  • RE: how to improve compactness? Warlich, Christof
• make -B and the order-only prerequisites John Gamboa
  • Re: make -B and the order-only prerequisites Philip Guenther
  • Re: make -B and the order-only prerequisites Rhys Ulerich
• Hiding a Make function AB
  • Re: Hiding a Make function Lane Schwartz
  • Re: Hiding a Make function AB
  • Re: Hiding a Make function Basile Starynkevitch
  • Re: Hiding a Make function Stephan Beal
• I need a help about make 邓东平
  • Re: I need a help about make Paul Smith
• unexplained behavior in autoconf-style stamp-h/config.h rule Peter Eisentraut
• UTF-16 Makefile Jaison Daniel J
  • Re: UTF-16 Makefile Paul Smith
• optional dependencies? Paul Wise
  • Re: optional dependencies? Erik Rull
• make and remote dependencies Paul Wise
  • Re: make and remote dependencies Paul Smith
  • Re: make and remote dependencies Paul Wise
  • Re: make and remote dependencies Paul Smith
• how to use not "also" symbolic link time, but "only" Mark Galeck (CW)
  • Re: how to use not "also" symbolic link time, but "only" Paul Smith
  • RE: how to use not "also" symbolic link time, but "only" Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: how to use not "also" symbolic link time, but "only" Mark Galeck (CW)
  • Re: how to use not "also" symbolic link time, but "only" Bryan Ischo
  • RE: how to use not "also" symbolic link time, but "only" Mark Galeck (CW)
  • Re: how to use not "also" symbolic link time, but "only" Michael Ludwig
• segfault (memory leak?) in GNU Make 3.82.90 (CVS HEAD) Martin d'Anjou
  • re: segfault (memory leak?) in GNU Make 3.82.90 (CVS HEAD) Martin d'Anjou
  • Re: segfault (memory leak?) in GNU Make 3.82.90 (CVS HEAD) Martin d'Anjou
  • Re: segfault (memory leak?) in GNU Make 3.82.90 (CVS HEAD) Paul Smith
  • Re: segfault (memory leak?) in GNU Make 3.82.90 (CVS HEAD) Martin d'Anjou
  • re: segfault (memory leak?) in GNU Make 3.82.90 (CVS HEAD) Martin d'Anjou
• SECONDEXPANSION and $(shell) bug in make 3.82.90 Martin d'Anjou
  • Re: SECONDEXPANSION and $(shell) bug in make 3.82.90 Paul Smith
  • Re: SECONDEXPANSION and $(shell) bug in make 3.82.90 Martin d'Anjou
• vagrind report of Make 3.82 segmentation fault with realloc invalid next size Martin d'Anjou
• Avoid generation of include files when doing "make clean" Warlich, Christof
  • Re: Avoid generation of include files when doing "make clean" Stephan Beal
  • RE: Avoid generation of include files when doing "make clean" Warlich, Christof
• under the explained algorithm of re-reading timestamps, how to deal with this common situation? Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: under the explained algorithm of re-reading timestamps, how to deal with this common situation? Mark Galeck (CW)
  • Re: under the explained algorithm of re-reading timestamps, how to deal with this common situation? Lane Schwartz
  • RE: under the explained algorithm of re-reading timestamps, how to deal with this common situation? Mark Galeck (CW)
• Re: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target david . hagood
  • Re: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Michael Ludwig
• this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Mark Galeck (CW)
  • Re: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Paul Smith
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Paul Smith
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Mark Galeck (CW)
  • Re: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Lane Schwartz
  • Re: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Paul Smith
  • Re: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Lane Schwartz
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Paul Smith
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Paul Smith
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Mark Galeck (CW)
  • Re: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Michael Ludwig
  • Re: this is embarrasing... prerequisiste gets updated, but make still says it is older than target Michael Ludwig
• CFLAGS/LDFLAGS for PIE vs PIC? Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: CFLAGS/LDFLAGS for PIE vs PIC? Bryan Ischo
  • RE: CFLAGS/LDFLAGS for PIE vs PIC? John Calcote
  • Re: CFLAGS/LDFLAGS for PIE vs PIC? Bryan Ischo
  • Re: CFLAGS/LDFLAGS for PIE vs PIC? Jeffrey Walton
• generate a file and then include it Rashed38
• Output of on "recipe" in arguments of subsequent recipes? Jack Bates
• Summer of Code John Gamboa
  • Re: Summer of Code Martin d'Anjou
  • Re: Summer of Code Martin d'Anjou
  • Re: Summer of Code John Gamboa
  • Re: Summer of Code Martin d'Anjou
  • Re: Summer of Code Paul Smith
  • Re: Summer of Code Rocky Bernstein
• I am not understanding .SECONDEXPANSION :( Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: I am not understanding .SECONDEXPANSION :( Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: I am not understanding .SECONDEXPANSION :( Mark Galeck (CW)
  • Re: I am not understanding .SECONDEXPANSION :( Paul Smith
• finer granularity in omitting errors from include statements sensible? Michele Zamparelli
  • Re: finer granularity in omitting errors from include statements sensible? Paul Smith
• Problem with pattern rules DrDavey
  • Re: Problem with pattern rules Paul Smith
• how to set an environment variable from within a makefile Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: how to set an environment variable from within a makefile Mark Galeck (CW)
  • Re: how to set an environment variable from within a makefile Philip Guenther
  • Re: how to set an environment variable from within a makefile Michael Ludwig
• Windows specific question - most convenient solution to set vars AngusC
  • Re: Windows specific question - most convenient solution to set vars Greg Chicares
• = or := for asignment? AngusC
  • Re: = or := for asignment? Paul Smith
  • RE: = or := for asignment? Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: = or := for asignment? Paul Smith
  • RE: = or := for asignment? Mark Galeck (CW)
• missing yushang
  • Re: missing Paul Smith
  • Re: missing yushang
• missing separator yushang
• ifeq and logical OR? Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: ifeq and logical OR? Dave Hylands
  • Re: ifeq and logical OR? Paul Smith
• backslash does not simply continue line? Mark Galeck (CW)
  • Re: backslash does not simply continue line? Paul Smith
  • RE: backslash does not simply continue line? Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: backslash does not simply continue line? Paul Smith
  • RE: backslash does not simply continue line? Brian R Cowan
  • RE: backslash does not simply continue line? Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: backslash does not simply continue line? Paul Smith
  • Re: backslash does not simply continue line? David Boyce
  • Re: backslash does not simply continue line? Paul Smith
  • Re: backslash does not simply continue line? David Boyce
• touching dependency files, take 2 Bruce Korb
• do I have to use recursive make to make one target fall on another? Mark Galeck (CW)
  • Re: do I have to use recursive make to make one target fall on another? Eli Zaretskii
  • RE: do I have to use recursive make to make one target fall on another? Mark Galeck (CW)
  • Re: do I have to use recursive make to make one target fall on another? Eli Zaretskii
  • RE: do I have to use recursive make to make one target fall on another? Mark Galeck (CW)
  • Re: do I have to use recursive make to make one target fall on another? Paul Smith
  • RE: do I have to use recursive make to make one target fall on another? Mark Galeck (CW)
• why is ./foobar target noted as foobar ?? Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: why is ./foobar target noted as foobar ?? Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: why is ./foobar target noted as foobar ?? Paul Smith
  • RE: why is ./foobar target noted as foobar ?? Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: why is ./foobar target noted as foobar ?? Paul Smith
• Trigger missing dependencies by changing order of execution? Tim Landscheidt
  • Re: Trigger missing dependencies by changing order of execution? Paul Smith
  • Re: Trigger missing dependencies by changing order of execution? Tim Landscheidt
  • Re: Trigger missing dependencies by changing order of execution? Olaf Hering
  • Re: Trigger missing dependencies by changing order of execution? Tim Landscheidt
  • Re: Trigger missing dependencies by changing order of execution? Mike Shal
  • Re: Trigger missing dependencies by changing order of execution? Tim Landscheidt
  • Re: Trigger missing dependencies by changing order of execution? Mike Shal
  • Re: Trigger missing dependencies by changing order of execution? Tim Landscheidt
  • Re: Trigger missing dependencies by changing order of execution? Mason
  • Re: Trigger missing dependencies by changing order of execution? Paul Smith
  • Re: Trigger missing dependencies by changing order of execution? Eric Melski
• $(MAKEFLAGS) and -j Warlich, Christof
  • RE: $(MAKEFLAGS) and -j Warlich, Christof
• Re: Weird make error (problem identified, work around provided) david . hagood
• libxenstore.so dependency ignored by make 3.82 Olaf Hering
• Need ways to make Makefiles more foolproof Bo Johansson
  • Re: Need ways to make Makefiles more foolproof Michael Ludwig
  • Re: Need ways to make Makefiles more foolproof Bo Johansson
  • Re: Need ways to make Makefiles more foolproof Michael Ludwig
  • Re: Need ways to make Makefiles more foolproof Bo Johansson
  • Re: Need ways to make Makefiles more foolproof Michael Ludwig
  • Re: Need ways to make Makefiles more foolproof Bo Johansson
  • Re: Need ways to make Makefiles more foolproof Michael Ludwig
• infer targets from dependencies Sébastien Barthélémy
  • Re: infer targets from dependencies Sébastien Barthélémy
• More on VPATH Bgh Ello
  • Re: More on VPATH Philip Guenther
• VPATH problem Bgh Ello
  • Re: VPATH problem Philip Guenther
  • Re: VPATH problem Michael Ludwig
  • Re: VPATH problem Michael Ludwig
  • how to remember updated targets across recursive make invocations? Mark Galeck (CW)
  • Re: how to remember updated targets across recursive make invocations? Philip Guenther
  • RE: how to remember updated targets across recursive make invocations? Mark Galeck (CW)
  • RE: how to remember updated targets across recursive make invocations? Paul Smith
• Weird make error david . hagood
  • Re: Weird make error Philip Guenther
  • Re: Weird make error david . hagood
• Changes in g++-4.4 to g++-4.6 affecting make Stephen D. Fox
  • Re: Changes in g++-4.4 to g++-4.6 affecting make Philip Guenther
• Getting the relative pathname of an included makefile Mason
  • Re: Getting the relative pathname of an included makefile Stephan Beal
  • Getting the relative pathname of an included makefile Mason
  • Re: Getting the relative pathname of an included makefile David Boyce
  • Re: Getting the relative pathname of an included makefile Mason
• Escaping ${STRING} Ian Gibbs
  • Re: Escaping ${STRING} Paul Smith
• run gdb from make riccardomanfrin
• Linking C++ and Make variables LINK.o, LINK.cc (.cpp, .C) Michael Ludwig
  • Re: Linking C++ and Make variables LINK.o, LINK.cc (.cpp, .C) Paul Smith
• [no subject] sriram ramachandran
  • Re: Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: Michael Ludwig

• Earlier messages
• Later messages