Brian said to Arle, who said

>> I only meant that discussion on the technicalities of Digital Rights
Management (DRM) for PDF documents was off topic, not the issue of how to
make sure the Muskett book enjoys a long life.

> I agree and was not trying to take the discussion off course, but was only
trying to point out some of the problems with a solution that had been put
forth about the Method book.

I think that everyone's point is well taken - we'd like to make sure that the
resources stay available, so some discussion of the logistics of that point
are reasonable.  At the same time, the full discussion of copyright in the
digital world could take the rest of our lives. ;-)  If Arle hadn't gently
tapped the brakes on the direction the conversation was going, I would have. 
It's pretty easy for a discussion to start one place and end up somewhere
totally different.  ;-)

> I completely agree with you regarding that most of the copyright
infringement is due to lack of availability.  I *need* this book personally
as I am very new to the Gurdy, but when I check Amazon, I get nothing
Michael. I would love to give you $50 for the book.  I would not accept a
copy that had been Xeroxed, as I respect the creative work of others - this
was my point about Doctorow's comment about "keeping honest users honest is
like keeping tall users tall."  That being said, note you have someone here
who is more than willing to buy the book but simply can't find a copy.

Cali and I used to carry this book and the D&H book (which is the other
"must-have" book).  We stopped because at that time it wasn't profitable for
us - we're not all about profit, but we had to focus on building, not on
running a retail establishment (which is also why we stopped selling CD's and
lute strings.)

Since there's a need for it, perhaps someone on the list would be willing to
coordinate a "group buy" of the Muskett book - take orders, have Michael send
them to you, then send them all out.

Any volunteers?

> I said above I am new to the Gurdy thing...  I am, but have "lurked" on this
list for at least a few years now.  And I guess this is as good of a time as
any to make this observation.  There are obviously some very talented and
knowledgeable people here, but I have been surprised by the closed nature of
the list.  I belong to many lists both professionally and personally - few
are as unfriendly.  This strikes me as sad, as I love the Gurdy and wish to
learn.  Having posted a "hello" or two that were ignored, to being quietly
told to "get on topic" by a list elder does not make for an environment
welcoming to those of us new and curious.

I'm sorry that you're experiencing the list this way.  It's my intent as
listmaster to keep the list friendly, while remaining relatively focussed on
the instrument.  It's an odd line to tread sometimes.

If you have concerns about the list, please discuss them with me privately.

Alden



Reply via email to