Honestly, it is very cheap now to buy an old used dual core /  2gb of memory 
for ~$120 and then send it off to a data center and will save you alot of 
hassle. 
 
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:04:12 -0700
> Subject: Re: [hlds] Win2k versus 2003 versus 2008 on older hardware
> 
> It may not be much of a cpu by today's standards, but it runs a fully loaded
> OP4 server and a fully loaded L4D server at 30% cpu. You know, if it ain't
> broke, don't fix it. I"ll go back to W2K before I'll spend money upgrading
> the box.
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bryce Quilley" <[email protected]>
> To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 6:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [hlds] Win2k versus 2003 versus 2008 on older hardware
> 
> 
> > Installing Win2k8 will make things worse. You need a minimum of 2GB ram
> > for
> > it to function.
> > Upgrade your CPU man, a Sempron is the cheapest piece of crap and was
> > NEVER
> > intended for server operation. At a bare minimum a P4 2.8 with 1GB ram
> > will
> > run Win2k3 perfectly. Win2k8 will need dual core with 2GB ram.
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Kyle Sanderson
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >> The general consensus with Server 2008 is it's more... gobbled up than
> >> 2003.
> >> However if you find it works better for you on older hardware (I would be
> >> shocked if it did), please let us know!
> >>
> >> Kyle.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ook <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Adding more ram isn't likely to help - it doesn't use what it has
> >> > as-is.
> >> >
> >> > I tried Linux for a while, but hlds used 30% cpu sitting there empty -
> >> and
> >> > it went downhill from there. This old cpu isn't up to running the linux
> >> > hlds
> >> > binaries - the general consensus is that valve never bothered to
> >> > optimize
> >> > them for linux hence they gobble excessive cpu. And yeah, I'm leaning
> >> > towards putting Win2k back on the box. I have a copy of server 2008
> >> > that
> >> I
> >> > think I'll install just so I can say I did, and to tell everyone how
> >> lousy
> >> > it is wiht this older box LOL. Or maybe it will surprise me and
> >> > actually
> >> > work good?
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Kyle Sanderson" <[email protected]>
> >> > To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
> >> > <[email protected]>
> >> > Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 5:53 PM
> >> > Subject: Re: [hlds] Win2k versus 2003 versus 2008 on older hardware
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > Why would adding more ram decrease the CPU usage on SRCDS?
> >> > >
> >> > > If I were you Ook I would go back to Win2000 as Microsoft only gets
> >> > > sloppier
> >> > > with their new releases of Windows. (Or try Linux, although from my
> >> > > experiences SRCDS tends to use more CPU and Ram on it.)
> >> > > Kyle.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Mike O'Laughlen
> >> > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Add more RAM.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Ook <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > I have an older box, AMD Sempron 2400+, 1GB ram, that I use for to
> >> run
> >> > >> > an
> >> > >> > OP4 server (hlds.exe) and a L4D server (srcds.exe). With Win2000
> >> > >> > and
> >> > >> > both
> >> > >> > servers full, cpu is about 30%.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > I upgraded it from Win2000 to server 2003, and when I did I
> >> > >> > noticed
> >> a
> >> > >> > significant increase in cpu consumption. On the Winserver 2003
> >> > >> > box,
> >> it
> >> > >> used
> >> > >> > 80-90% cpu. My first guess was that the cpu scheduler in server
> >> > >> > 2003
> >> > >> > has
> >> > >> > more overhead and the context switches were using up all the extra
> >> > cpu.
> >> > >> My
> >> > >> > second guess was that I really didn't have a clue why. On both
> >> > >> > installations
> >> > >> > I stopped all services I didn't think needed to be running.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > I have a copy of Server 2008, but I'm thinking this box may be too
> >> old
> >> > >> > to
> >> > >> > run that. Also performance under 2003 wasn't that great, I'm not
> >> sure
> >> > >> > it
> >> > >> > would be any better under 2008.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Anyone have experience running server 2003/2008 on older hardware
> >> re.
> >> > >> > performance?
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> >> archives,
> >> > >> > please visit:
> >> > >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> _______________________________________________
> >> > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> >> > >> archives,
> >> > >> please visit:
> >> > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >> > >>
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> >> > > archives,
> >> > > please visit:
> >> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> >> > please visit:
> >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> >> please visit:
> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
> visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

_________________________________________________________________
New! Get to Messenger faster: Sign-in here now!
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9677407
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to