You should send this to someone at Valve, we already know. On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Kigen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, I'm Kigen (many may know me from my anti-cheat, Kigen's > Anti-Cheat). > > I would like to list a few reasons for closing the VSP interface on > clients. While it can be useful at times its harm more than outweighs > any good it does. At present it provides a way for people to exploit > the engine without the risk of getting a VAC ban for injecting a > cheat. So far from what I've witnessed over time people are now > flocking to using the VSP interface because VALVe doesn't stop them > from doing so, nor is there the risk of getting VAC banned either. > Also, developing on the VSP interface for cheat makers is how they can > make production time faster. As seen in this URL: > http://forum.gamedeception.net/threads/19573-C-TF2-Your-first-cheat > The VSP interface has more usefulness to cheat developers than it does > anybody else. Using CVar detectors like KAC and zBlock won't continue > to work to stop this. At the rate of expansion of the use of VSP it > will far exceed my capacity to fight it by myself. Plus by leaving > the VSP interface open wanna be cheat developers will have a easier > time learning how to create cheats for Source engine games and test it > with the client. At present I cannot see a good reason to leave the > VSP interface open on the client. > > Respecfully, > - Kigen > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds >
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
