-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] A 32 slot dod:s server is pretty nigh on maxing out most cpu's ~ 3G area is my point which no one seems to have bothered mentioning (and no one seems to have asked what cpus are in the dell), HT or not. Mine were hitting ~ 90% cpu usage on both ht and none ht servers when full (see earlier mails when dod:s was released for cpu usage reported).
On 10/6/05, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This topic has nothing to do with what are your thoughts on HT... > Besides, do those benchmarks happen to include game servers? valves > engine? > > Try and generate the same problem. Load a >26 slot server similar to > the original posters configuration. I can generate similar results on > a couple of non production machines, disabling HT does fix the > problem (it's been verified by others on this list before.) > > /ges > > At 02:05 PM 10/6/2005, Ian mu wrote: > >-- > >[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > >For those who think HT is the problem, can they explain why benchmarks > show > >most none-multithreaded apps run faster (albeit only slightly) ? Don't > >really want to turn this into a ht argument, but I'd like to see some > >supporting evidence of the various criticisms of ht we see so often. > > As an example...from here (has single threaded benchmarks with ht > enabled) > >http://www.sharkyextreme.com/hardware/cpu/article.php/3261_1500631__1 > >Quote: > > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
