-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Does anyone have any statistics to show which CPU brand is better for HLDS servers? Between the Intel and AMD's? Although user opinions are important - I need statistics to make a valid judgement as to which one would perform with the most servers and less lag.
On 1/18/07, Valtteri Kiviniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, true. But dont fix it if it ain't broken. :) I'll change to 32bit > only when 64bit won't work anymore. > > -- > Valtteri > > Andrew Forsberg kirjoitti: > > On 18/01/2007, at 1:16 PM, Valtteri Kiviniemi wrote: > >> > >> Also, if i run 32bit HLDS servers in 64bit debian the server fps is > >> only > >> 333. Why? > >> > >> With 64bit binary the fps is constant 500, and CPU usage is only a few > >> percent. > > > > 64 bit hlds native is no longer supported by Valve. It did run > > considerably better, but they haven't maintained it for well over a > > year. You have to choose between a binary suited to your > > architecture, or a binary which has all the latest patches. I opted > > for the latter with my machines, but I know other admins have chosen > > to stick with the old 64bit builds. > > > > I do wonder if the compulsory advertising within cs 1.6 games will > > cause the 64 bit build engine to become incompatible with 1.6 > > clients. If so you'll have no choice but to move to the 32 bit builds. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
