The idea about HTTPS is that there is a growing push to monitor and harm traffic on the internet. A fix for this is https, and as stated before:

   an extreme explanation might be: it could help against tampering ...

   if you have an ISP that do not wants you to play they could just

   corrupt

    each and every fast download tries... with https istead that could be
    very hard (in both detecting the typo of file being downloaded and
    breaking into an ssl stream corrupting it)

    Nowadays, expecially in countries where "privacy" is just a word on a
    dictionary, everything should be run within encrypted tunnels

This is something that modern day china, and other countries are pushing towards. Im not trying to be illegal, but rather make it so that its harder to track users downloading files off my fastdl.

We should all be pushing to increase https usage in this modern day world to not only protect our users, but also to hide the traffics full intent to outside eyes.

The main reason for my blow up below is the fact that I'm so tired of responses that simply do not help the thread progress. Its common on here, and it is bloody annoying. In any case I understand your point about the extra cost and lowering of speed by switching to https, but I simply want to know if it would be possible at all to do.

On 10/5/2012 2:45 PM, Bruno Garcia wrote:
I'm not trying to criticize your thread or your means to use the Fast
download functionality.
I'm simple stating that you would get a better result for less cost.

I'm sorry if it was mis intended in that way.

On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Cameron Munroe <[email protected]>wrote:

This is why I hate this thread, there is never any good answers just
criticism. The question is fully legitimate as since your an idiot and
don't understand that testing is sorta hard considering you have to buy a
50+ license.


As I stated to the other guy, if you have nothing productive to say don't
bloody fucking say it.


God how hard is that, to keep your mouth shut.





On 10/5/2012 2:31 PM, Ulrich Block wrote:

Am 05.10.2012 23:26, schrieb Cameron Munroe:

Maybe by your opinion. Now if you have nothing "productive" to state on
whether it works or not then stop replying as I already understand the
below and that it has a cost.

So much time and posts have past... During that period try and error
would have been much faster


______________________________**_________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.**com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**hlds_linux<https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux>


______________________________**_________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.**com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**hlds_linux<https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux>

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to