+1 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Richardson Sent: jeudi 13 octobre 2011 02:42 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [homenet] Does ND Proxy useful for homenet?
>>>>> "Victor" == Victor Kuarsingh <[email protected]> writes: Victor> These devices (in such operating modes) are however not Victor> likely to participate in a home network (as the gateway Victor> device or a router) and it's very unlikely to be the head of Victor> home network. I STRONGLY DISAGREE. Not only will smartphones be pressed into use whenever the primary ISP is down (I've done this three times in 18 months since I got a smartphone), but whenever there is an ad-hoc gathering of people who need network, they will insist that their smartphones be smart. I expect my smartphone to provide network to my Personal Area Network (whether via Bluetooth PAN or Zigbee), and I further expect that PAN to have an alternate exit via my HAN. I want to further point out that 3GPP and the mobile operators are no longer in control of what phones do. They are network devices. The only thing they can control is the protocol on the wire, and if they piss of the consumer, the consumer will simply tunnel. It's good that 3G will have PD in the future. I know that new versions of SIXXS AICCU now include it. -- ] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[ ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[ Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE> then sign the petition. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
