On 05/03/2013 22:03, STARK, BARBARA H wrote:
> I would prefer if a (internal) router that is not given a /64 provided
> me with a "warning" that offered options for alternate ways to configure
> the router. These options might include bridging, NPTv6, or even NAT66,
> and I would be told what I would be giving up (what would break) if I
> went with any of these choices.
There is no reason to consider NAT66. It could try ULA+NPTv6,
but I would have thought that Mark is right - telling you to set
all devices in bridge mode while looking for a better ISP is
probably the most practical option.
Whether this belongs in the IETF architecture description is
another matter.
Brian
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
