On 3/5/13 5:22 PM, "Mark Andrews" <[email protected]> wrote:
>There is no real reasons for ISP's to only do /64s except spite the >customer. The difference in costs from the RIRs for the bigger >address space is chump change even for developing states. All their >equipment will support > /64 because the big players want to support >that. > Actually, that's not quite right. A number of ISPs are only offering /64s because a significant number of IPv6-supporting home routers can't handle shorter prefixes (although it's getting better) - we've seen this in our lab. ISPs I've spoken with plan to offer shorter prefixes as home routers can support them. > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
