On 9 Mar 2013, at 02:05, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>> "STARK," == STARK, BARBARA H <[email protected]> writes: > STARK> Switching ISPs is not an option at this time. This is the > STARK> only provider who offers something close to 30Mbps at a > STARK> consumer-friendly price. I'm not going to move, either. In > STARK> the world of trade-offs and doing what's right for me, the > STARK> /64 is among the least of my concerns. For IETF homenet to > STARK> attempt to influence CE router vendors to force me to care, > > I think you should, until your ISP and your CE router are sorted out, > turn off your IPv6 at your router, and just use Teredo or an explicit > tunnel with sixxs.net for your work-at-home IPv6 needs. > > I don't think that homenet should accomodate the particular set of > constraints that you have. I believe that they will go away. > > (me: I prefer end to end connectivity over the multi-dozen-megabit/s > consumer-style, high-latency, bufferbloated incument telco junk. Mind > you, they can't even spell IPv6...) The candidate -08 has a reference to BCP 157. And text basically as per Ran stated. If you get a /64, then if you're in a single subnet dual-stack network you may well be fine. But you can't expect to route to further subnets internally under the architecture as defined (though you are of course free to manually configure bridging mode or NPTv6 yourself...). Tim _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
