On Mar 13, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > Why is it "likely"? This can very easily be rewritten to be agnostic as to > who provides a global naming service for a homenet. If there isn't anything > extenuating, that is what should be done.
I think agnostic is good, but illustrative examples are good as well, and the two I would suggest are that the ISP provides a mechanism for naming, and that a cloud service provides a mechanism for naming. Obviously you can also set up your own name service, but I don't think this is a good example for the use case we are trying to address. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
