On 03/13/2013 01:55 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Mar 13, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
The reason I bring this up is that I don't understand why a single namespace
is "desirable". What are the implications if that is not the case? What
assumedly
bad thing will happen if that's not the case? What goodness flows if it is?
If you have devices that need to be addressed outside of the homenet, then you
have to have a global namespace, and of course that means a single namespace.
And if you wander to another homenet, and devices are in the same namespace,
you may wind up turning up your host's (or their neighbor's) air conditioning.
And this is both orthogonal to my concern, as well as worth mentioning in
this section, I think.
Mike
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
