On 03/13/2013 01:48 PM, Tim Chown wrote:
The reason I bring this up is that I don't understand why a single namespace
is "desirable". What are the implications if that is not the case? What
assumedly
bad thing will happen if that's not the case? What goodness flows if it is?
If there's some hidden assumption here, it would be nice for it to be made
explicit.
If there really is no motivation for this, it should just be deleted.
It has been reworded to "at least one". It's "desirable" in as much as not
having one is highly undesirable, at least if you want remote access.
Ah, one vs none, not one vs many. Ok.
Mike
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
