On Aug 5, 2015, at 4:49 PM, Dino Farinacci <farina...@gmail.com> wrote: > (1) Have homenet adopt both protocols. Let the market decide. That means > there may be routing protocol redistribution in the home. This would be a > mistake. > > (2) Pick one and move on. This has a chance of working if open source is > available because vendors will take the quick-approach into delivering a > solution. We saw this work with SNMP in the 90s (but this wasn’t an > open-source case but a single reference implementation case). > > (3) Pick one and hope it catches on. Vendors, if they have vision will say > the chosen one was BS, and they will do their own. That means there may be > routing protocol redistribution in the home. This would be a mistake. > > Just pick one and hope (2) prevails. And we know from experience that > whatever is chosen will be tweaked to adapt to new requirements or fix > unanticipated problems.
I also prefer (2). I suspect we disagree on which one to pick, but otherwise I agree that this is the right approach.
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
