> So just to put myself in the line of fire now, it appears that we have had > good progress on Babel (yeah I know the WG gap - but that can be fixed can't > it?), but what technological reason is there which makes just going with this > so problematic? Had the case been the same for IS-IS for this use case > profile, I would have stated the reverse.
Okay, you make good points. I’ll start the voting. I vote for Babel. Dino _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
