Thanks Daniel. And you’re not too late. The call ends this coming Friday. So if 
anyone else wants to chime in, please do. I’ll try to create a summary Thursday 
describing what I think I’ve heard so far. That should give everyone a brief 
chance to tell me how badly I’ve misinterpreted their statements before the 
call ends.

From: homenet [] On Behalf Of Daniel Migault
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 2:37 PM
To: Michael Richardson <>
Subject: Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed 
draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

I apology for the late response (I was off for two weeks). I will update the 
draft by the end of the month integrating numerous feed backs we received.
As a co-author I am supporting the adoption of this document architecture. I 
believe that given the current situation regarding homenet and naming, the 
simple but useful scope of the draft will help the WG to move forward regarding 
naming and home network. I agree the document is not yet in a final version and 
feed back from the WG will be very helpful. That said I think, since last IETF, 
we have a pretty good view on where we are going.

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Michael Richardson 
<<>> wrote:
Ted Lemon <<>> wrote:
    > to put the CFA on hold pending that update. There have been some good
    > comments already, though; in particular, I think Juliusz' point that it
    > would
    > be nice to actually try some of this in practice is good, and is what
    > I'm

We require interoperable implementations for Internet Standard, not to adopt
a document.  Implementation reports would be good for WGLC, not here!
We need to lower the bar here, not raise it.  WGs can abandon documents too.

    > That said, what I said in the working group is that we've been spinning
    > our wheels on this for several years, and I wanted to know if the scope
    > of this is reasonable and is what the working group wants to take
    > on. If it's not,
    > then I don't actually know how to proceed.

I think that it's the right approach, and given the sort out of the MVDP,
I support adoption.

]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
        |   ruby on rails    [

homenet mailing list<><>

homenet mailing list

Reply via email to