> I wanted to know if the scope of this is reasonable and is what the > working group wants to take on.
I think the scope of this is too wide. It tries to solve a number of different problems: 1. naming within the Homenet; 2. publishing names of Homenet nodes outside the Homenet; 3. resolving names outside the Homenet in the presence of multiple providers; 4. announcing multiple providers' naming spaces when the providers provide inconsistent information. My gut feeling is that if you insist on a single protocol that solves all four, you'll end up with more complexity than if you solve each problem on its own. > If it's not, then I don't actually know how to proceed. I suggest picking just one problem and solving it. (1) in the above list would be the obvious choice. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet