Hi, > On 30 Jul 2017, at 18:19, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > I have read homenet-naming. > > It wasn't quite the document I was expecting. > But rather seems to leverage upon a number of other draft-sctl* documents in > progress. > > What are the plans for draft-sctl-*?
I don’t think they’re cited in this draft. Many of them are over in the dnssd WG. See Stuart’s deck from Prague for context: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/slides/slides-99-dnssd-dns-sd-update-and-new-work-items-00.pdf > and then there is draft-ietf-mid-mpvd-ndp-support as a normative reference. > Will homenet will to adopt that too? > > So it seems that I have to read the other documents in detail before I can > make any clear opinion as to how this all fits together. > (I think I've missed the last two homenet WG meetings due to conflicts; I > should watch them on meetecho recording to learn more I guess) It turned out that only 4 people had time to read them for Prague. The interesting twist is the pushback on multicast for future specs. I agree it’s early for an adoption call, likewise for the draft-sctl-* drafts in dnssd. Tim > > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > firstname.lastname@example.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list email@example.com https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet