This is an architecture document, not a protocol specification.

On Jul 31, 2017 7:36 AM, "Juliusz Chroboczek" <> wrote:

> > I wanted to know if the scope of this is reasonable and is what the
> > working group wants to take on.
> I think the scope of this is too wide.  It tries to solve a number of
> different problems:
>   1. naming within the Homenet;
>   2. publishing names of Homenet nodes outside the Homenet;
>   3. resolving names outside the Homenet in the presence of multiple
> providers;
>   4. announcing multiple providers' naming spaces when the providers
>      provide inconsistent information.
> My gut feeling is that if you insist on a single protocol that solves all
> four, you'll end up with more complexity than if you solve each problem on
> its own.
> > If it's not, then I don't actually know how to proceed.
> I suggest picking just one problem and solving it.  (1) in the above list
> would be the obvious choice.
> -- Juliusz
homenet mailing list

Reply via email to