According to Natalija Stevens: > Oh, ok it is 3.2.0b4-011302. > > It just seem that the most relevant documents get the least amount of stars > ( documents with searched keywords and titles) and those which are the least > important (search word mentioned a few times in text) get the most of the > stars. It is confusing and misleading for those doing the search. > > Natalija Stevens
OK, I thought all the 3.2 scoring bugs had been fixed before that snapshot, but just in case, would you be willing to try the latest snapshot to see if it makes a difference? I'd also be interested in knowing if you have the same problem with 3.1.6 as well. The changes in 3.2's scoring were supposed to improve relevance ranking over the 3.1 series, but it may be that there are cases that lead to odd behaviour (perhaps triggered by setting a bunch of factors to 0?), so it would be informative to get some comparative results. -- Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/ Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 _______________________________________________ htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a subject of unsubscribe FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
