Erik Krause a écrit : > Is there really anyone using HDR tonemapping to get a viewable panorama > after there was enfuse? I see the necessity of HDR merging to get > panoramas for image based lighting, but I never saw a result of HDR > tonemapping (whatever algorithm) that surpasses an enfused result in > terms of natural appearance except maybe after long tweaking A bit more seriously, there is something I don't like with enfuse, it's that sometimes you get very unnatural results,
Compare this one (enfused) http://flickr.com/photos/styeb/3071381838/ to this one (hdr) http://flickr.com/photos/styeb/3070564323/ The exposures were -1 , 0 +1 EV So I do enfuse when I get no other choice or when I encounter the OpenEXR bug... esby / Y. Tennevin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
