2009/4/19 grow <[email protected]> > > Harry, > > Thanks for the rapid response. > While I posted the message I noticed that it looked like Hugin was > running out memory and wondered whether there was buffer somewhere > whose size I could increase. > > So I will tweak that preference and give it a try. > > I have Hugin running a big stitch 12,000 x 6,000 stitch at the > moment ... that will take another hour or so and then I will give the > increased buffer a try later this evening. > > Do you know would a larger buffer improve performance generally? I > have 5.5 Gb of RAM on this machine so I could easily give it more than > 75Mb all the time. >
I have 2GB of RAM and I have been working with sizes of 250-350MB. Somewhere last year we had this 76 6Mpix images. I had the buffer at 125 MB and when I increased it to 350 MB, the performance improvement was impressive. I haven't got exact measurements though and I didn't try to optimize. Maybe it would have been faster with 250 MB or 450MB. I really don't know. It was just better when going from 125MB to 350MB. Harry --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
