On Dec 7, 11:27 am, kfj <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for sharing. I had a look at your data. One thing straight > away: you have Z-values. You don't want them, since the scale of all > the images is the same, and Z values refer to the distance from the > mosaic plane. Just set Z to zero.
Actually the scale strongly varies among the 24 pieces (maybe not in the sample I provided though), so I have Z factors. One of my problems is to convert this Z factor into a scaling factor (see the message about the transX/Y/Z parameters). > Stitching this, with the input images' projection and the panorama > projection set to rectilinear, should give you a result where the > input images aren't distorted at all, just nudged into place. Yes, it works, but the process doesn't scale (because of the memory and the required manual steps). > Finally, I'd like to ask you how sure you are that the errors of > 'several metres' you've observed after georeferncing the data with > JOSM might not be in the source material? The cadastre is reference for the property limits, so it's very accurate. I could verify that myself by stitching myself a few samples. They fit very well. > To use the data as source for OSM, I think you'd be > well advised not to stitch the maps with hugin, but to georeference > the individual sheets as best as you can, be it in JOSM or QGIS. That was actually my first approach, but since I don't have precise sources for the georefencing, it's not accurate enough. That's the reason why I am trying to use the internal consistency of the pieces between each other. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
