FYI: I am stitching microscope images but it would ruin it if i optimized roll, x, and y. So I only optimize x and y. This gives me PERFECT stitchings every time. w00t!
jordan On Dec 7, 2010, at 3:59 AM, voschix wrote: > Olivier, > > as I am also starting to do some work with OSM, I got interested and > stitched your two samples. I had no problems, at least with the two > sample maps you provided. I think the quality of the result is > sufficient for OSmapping. Have look: > http://picasaweb.google.com/voschix/DesktopFoto?authkey=Gv1sRgCNXI35bH4LStLQ&feat=directlink > > What I did: > - Loaded both images > - inserted manually four control points along the border > - Optimised for: roll, X, Y > - Stitched with remapped images > - Loaded both images in GIMP, cut out a piece from one map, moved them > manually, and merged them > > Regards from Italy > > Volker > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
