On Dec 7, 9:59 am, voschix <[email protected]> wrote: > as I am also starting to do some work with OSM, I got interested and > stitched your two samples. I had no problems, at least with the two > sample maps you provided. I think the quality of the result is > sufficient for OSmapping. Have > look:http://picasaweb.google.com/voschix/DesktopFoto?authkey=Gv1sRgCNXI35b...
Hi Volker ! Thanks for your help. Stitching 2 pieces is indeed not a problem, as I mentioned earlier the problem is to stitch 24 of them together with the required quality. The 2 sample files (and resulting picture) don't have the necessary quality to read the names of the roads. The resolution needs to be by factors higher, plus there are 12 times more input pictures, so the size of the final picture is not manageable by home computers. To solve this, Hugin would have output tiles of the big picture instead of a single file, without loading the whole in memory. I could imagine this requires quite some design changes. Additionally, this step : > - Loaded both images in GIMP, cut out a piece from one map, moved them > manually, and merged them is not doable on a large scale. This process has to be repeated for lots and lots of pieces and towns. Here I see 2 solutions : - more options for the blending : for instance, in this case, dst=min(src1, src2) for each color channel would do the trick - support of transparency in both input and output (like I said, original PNG's are not black on white, but black on transparent) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
