Thanks Carlos. I'd really like to see how someone does their work. Sorry your efforts ended in frustration. I like how you have used the little planet projection as a transition into your panos (haven't seen that before.) If those are your son(s) you must be married to an "octo-Mom." ;-) --John
On Nov 4, 7:45 am, "Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola)" <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess we can adjust many parallax problem by hand on any image editor > like GIMP, PS or lightroom. If you know how to use some selection tools, > copy, paste, rotate, clone and healing you can adjust many hard parallax > problems that can happend on a moving scene or in a hand held shot > panorama. I almost always do some kind of final correction on my panos, as > I want to try to make them as perfect as I can. Sometimes it is a very hard > job. On this panorama, for example, I have spent about 10 hours of editing > to fix all parallax errors: > > http://cartola.org/360/en/2011/06/01/bruno-at-village-rio-verdes-pool/ > > I didn't use a tripod and this was one of my first experience on fixing > parallax errors like this. > > I sweart I tried to record a short movie from the screen here, fixing the > parallax common problems, but after a long time and after 5 tries I got > angry and gave it up... I did it many times before, but the tool is failing > now, I don't know why... I'll try another day... > > Cheers, > > Carlos E G Carvalho (Cartola)http://cartola.org/360 > > 2011/11/4 kfj <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > On 4 Nov., 06:07, JohnPW <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I have some images I recently took handheld on a small yacht sailing > > > in San Francisco Bay. I had to put all the control points on > > > stationary parts of the boat since anything else was in constant > > > motion. It has made me want to do more hand blending and masking to > > > make the (very mismatched) horizon less jarring and to fix a few > > > things on the boat that moved. I was considering how best to do it. > > > Forgive my slightly off-topic reply, but here it is anyway: > > > When I was a student, I attempted a project to analyze some (real- > > world, messy, processed...) animal feed raw materials by way of an > > image analysis system. This was in the eighties: I had a (nice :-) > > video microscope and a 512X512 monochrome frame grabber in an AT > > compatible computer. I showed the images I was working on to the prof > > who was reading computer vision at my uni. He looked at them and told > > me my problem was 'ill-posed'. I was a bit miffed at the time, but as > > my project proceeded I had no choice but eventually to come to the > > same conclusion. > > > If the scene isn't static, you'll have a very hard time 'stitching' it > > together: it's like trying to make a garment from wrongly-cut pieces > > of material. I'd say the problem is ill-posed. What you need isn't a > > panorama stitcher but an optical system that captures all the moving > > bits in one go. > > > Yet I'm curious to hear a few good tips on fixing the horizon > > 'manually', even though I usually manage to get the horizon right, > > sacrificing precision elsewhere in the stitch. > > > Kay > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > >http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
