On 11/15/11, JohnPW <[email protected]> wrote: > At the risk of sounding like a moron (as I usually do) I'll respond.
No you are not. > I've only recently experimented with this myself. But my initial > thought is, "Do you want a mosaic or a pano?" > Actually, it really sounds like you might want a linear pano rather > than a mosaic. Or possibly a series of partial panos joined into a > linear pano? Please forgive me but English is neither my first or my second language. I want one photo of the whole street, what you would call a "linear pano". Never heard of that expression before, but it makes sense. I want one long photo that is like standing in front of each house, perpendicular, for the whole street. I used the word "mosaic" because a couple of month ago there was a thread on how to make a mosaic, and I thought that we were talking about the same thing. > Another approach (which you also touch on) is a linear > series of conventional panoramas (like Google StreetView.) But you > imply that you want to make partial panoramas and stitch them > together into one large, long image like a linear panorama. > So maybe you haven't decided for sure what your final product should > be? What is your aim? I thought of doing many small panos of 2 images and each one covering 3 to 4 houses. I was going to do the panos to simplify, there are 37 houses on that street. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
