On 18 Nov., 00:13, JohnPW <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 17, 4:13 pm, kfj <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This is why we now try and coerce 2D hardware to do a 1D job. > > I actually think using a 2D camera might be superior in many ways. > Besides ready availability of interchangeable equipment, it would > also be more forgiving of camera movement while also allowing you to > readily remove moving object artifacts. That's a point (or two, rather ;-) And maybe trying to do stay 1D and even 2D is too limiting anyway - eventually, we'll embrace 3D scene reconstruction, and for that purpose parallax becomes an asset. Kay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
