On 6 Jan., 00:38, Erik Krause <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 05.01.2012 21:32, schrieb Naked Robot: > > > we need another tool, for "cutting" the source images in the right places. > > This is the challenge. Finding the best seam line is the hard part, that > what makes smartblend really smart! Michal Norel gave a hint: > Psychovisual Error and Kolmogorov Min Cut (whatever this means). AFAIK > Kolmogorov Min Cut was already discussed for enblend (could be the > current seam optimization does this already).
Intelligent seam placement is also computationally expensive. I remember when enblend changed to the new algorithm recently that made it more smartblendish, processing times went up noticeably. I'd be curious to know how much of the processing time in enblend is devoted to the actual blending, and how much needs to be invested in seam placement. Kay Kay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
