2012/1/6 Monkey <[email protected]> > 360 degree wrapping is a function > of the blending process, so a multiblend-specific solution needs to be > found (I suspect Enblend's solution stems from the fact that it does > many separate blends, so won't be compatible with multiblend). So > while there may be ideas multiblend can borrow from Enblend and vice > versa, I don't think a hybrid would be an improvement. > > I do off course see the importance of the 360 degree wrapping. However, for me it is completely UNnecessary. I use a compact camera and have made only 2-5 360 degree panos over the past year, and never with nadir images. I simply make wide angle panos or "high resolution" images the way Max Lyons does (1). For me the memory consumption is of far more importance than the 360 degree seam. Apart from the memory consumption multiblend is already for me an excellent replacement for enblend.
Harry (1): <http://www.tawbaware.com/maxlyons/index.html> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
