Heh. Blending is a form of averaging, so Matthew's approach should probably work. What I'd like to know is whether his approach is the best one for my use case. There might be superfluous steps, or steps that would work better with a different tools, or different parameters. Not know the full tool suite means I have too many options to explore, and I'd like to do something that's at least mildly competent. Within, say, the next four weeks or so - I could spend the next six months trying out tool combinations, and would probably get results, but I hate being clueless about the overall sanity of an approach. Besides, it's fully possible that there's a readymade, competently optimized tool out there that combines cpfind, autooptimizer, etc. for me.
BTW Matthews work again showed me that I don't even know all the relevant tools. Nona sounds highly interesting, but I wasn't aware that it even exists. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/78106ace-ff87-45cf-aa30-17f95bc6ccd4%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
