Vic- great that the problem of hum is being taken seriously now and thanks 
for highlghting your insights into BPL
This is always worth a re read as it's hard to take in in one go.
However, there is no connection  between the general case you make and any 
individual - UNLESS you can give the details of exposure, reaction to local 
KNOWN conditions of BPL etc. 
Restating the precursors to a condition doesn't make it apply everywhere. 
It wouldn't get anywhere in a court of law. Surely you know this?

On Friday, 13 April 2012 13:47:10 UTC+1, Vic wrote:
>
> Here ya go, being looked at right now by SADS associations worldwide. 
> And Josh I don't believe you've read any evidence that has been put 
> together. 
>
> Wherever BPL/B-PLC is operational in the power lines there is 
> REACTANCE at the mains frequency; either 50Hz or 60HZ dependent on 
> country. 
> In the USA, at 60Hz/120V, this reactance power level is between 60 and 
> 80dBC (observed). In countries with 50Hz/230 or 240V this reactance 
> power level is between 60 and 95dBC (observed). These are statements 
> of fact and were taken from power spectrum sample data. 
> A reactance power level of 60dBC equates to approximately **1KW/cm2; 
> 80dBC to approximately **10KW/cm2; 95dBC to approximately **40KW/cm2. 
> All of the above power levels are calculated at ground level under a 
> power line – Approximately 18 feet high/distance. 
> ** Using the formula: 10log10 (P X 1/0.001) = (nn)dBm (milliwatts) 
> A quick look at REACTANCE resultant subharmonic frequencies compared 
> to heartbeat/pulse rate: 
> 50Hz                        Octave 
> Note                        60Hz                Octave Note 
> Low        48.56Hz                G1                                58.2705Hz 
>        Bb1 
>
> High        53.112Hz                A1/Ab1                                
> 63.735Hz        B1 
>
> Low        1.44bps                                                1.73bps 
> High        3.735bps                                                3.112bps 
>
> Low        72bpm                                                        
> 103.77bpm 
>
> High        224.1bpm                                                186.72bpm 
>
> Key: Hz = Hertz        bps = Heartbeats per Second                bpm = 
> Heartbeats per 
> minute 
>
> The below text is taken from the National Emergency Medical 
> Association website: 
> http://www.nemahealth.org/programs/healthcare/heart_rate_pulse.htm 
> Resting Heart Rate anywhere in the range of 60 - 90 is considered in 
> the normal range. Your Heart Rate will fluctuate a lot depending on 
> such factors as your activity level and stress level. If however, your 
> pulse is consistently above 90, you should consult with your 
> physician. 
> Example: 
> If you count 12 beats in the span of 10 seconds, multiply 12 X 6 = 72. 
> This means your Heart Rate or pulse, is 72 (or 72 beats per minute). 
> Target Heart Rate for an Athlete 
> Take 220 and subtract your age. This will give you a predicted maximum 
> heart rate. 
> For example, if you are 22 years old, subtract 22 from 220 (220 - 22 = 
> 198). This means that your maximum physiological limit as to how fast 
> your heart should beat is 198 beats per minute. 
> 27 years old: 220 – 27 = 193bpm, 33 years old: 220 – 33 = 187bpm, etc. 
> Conclusion: 
> The above chart shows that BPL/B-PLC derived mains-electricity 
> Reactance subharmonic frequencies and human heartbeat rate, across the 
> board, have very similar properties. 
> Regardless of how you compare the above data, the fact remains; should 
> someone be in the vicinity of a medium and above strength BPL/B-PLC 
> derived mains electricity reactance there is a high probability that 
> their heartbeat would be force-modulated to the high-power subharmonic 
> pulses. 
> In medical terms this is known as Ventricular fibrillation (V-fib or 
> VF) and is a condition in which there is uncoordinated contraction of 
> the cardiac muscle of the ventricles in the heart making them quiver 
> rather than contract properly. Ventricular fibrillation is the most 
> commonly identified arrhythmia in cardiac arrest patients. 
>
>
> On Apr 13, 7:10 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: 
> > I agree Josh. Unless there is direct evidence of previous problems with 
> EM 
> > effects etc. it won't help our case to blame any unfortunate young death 
> on 
> > this without data that would make it a high grade suspect 
> > 
> > The information is there to kill this "thing". Why isn't anyone doing 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > anything? 
> > 
> > > There are a lot of groups of people taking out legal complaints over 
> > > in the States now that they know what "it" is. Others who were going 
> > > after stopping the so-called "smart" meters have swung BPL info into 
> > > their litigation too. 
> > 
> > > C'mon everybody.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum 
Sufferers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/hum-sufferers/-/ddiyx_SZcjwJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.

Reply via email to