There is another reason why this "thing" is doable. Its unique fingerprint: It is also the reason why no one has ever figired it out before. Electrical System harmonics are NOT the same as OCTAVE harmonics, however, WE don't hear electrical harmonics, we hear OCTAVE harmonics. If you read the below you'll understand why it's pin- downable:
A periodical signal can be written as a sum of harmonics (using the harmonic form of the Fourier series), each harmonic having its own intensity (which decreases as the frequency of the harmonic increases). This harmonics are not abstract mathematical stuff. You can observe them while trying to set a TV channel and you see that you can catch that channel on several frequencies (these are the harmonics). The best quality will have the first harmonic (the fundamental) because it has the highest intensity. If you set the channel on the 2nd harmonic you will see that it will be noisy, and if you set it on the 3rd it will be even noisier (because it's intensity is lower). Now if you think of the inverse Fourier transform (which is an integral) as of a sum of harmonics of very close frequencies you can find an analogy: the direct Fourier transform of the signal (found in the formula of the inverse transform) plays the same role as the amplitude of the harmonics in the Fourier series. That's why it is called "spectral density of the complex amplitude". As you know, the energy is proportional to the square of the amplitude (intensity) so, the energy spectral density will be the square of the modulus of the Fourier transform (the Fourier transform has complex value). If you consider that the signal is applied on an ideal resistor of 1 ohm you can say that the square of the modulus of the Fourier transform is the spectral density of the power. No wriggle room there. :P The scans that were completed are complex amplitude - The Power Spectrum readings ONLY come from the BPL signal's setup - Which as we all know by now is termed - Large Size Constellation Fast Hartley Transorm (FHT) Matrix Modulation. these frequencies vs, dB levels are as shown in the FFT Frequency and Cross Spectrum dB Power Levels of Broadband over Power Lines Emissions paper. You were saying? On Apr 13, 8:08 pm, Vic <[email protected]> wrote: > Macro-Micro-Pico-Femto – You just don’t get it > > When I was born, apparently, the nurse said, “Look at the balls on > that guy!” > > As I went through life with these balls they have gotten me into and > out of a lot of trouble. > > SADS-BPL Correlation is part of 3 litigation lawsuits. I have the > balls to do it. I have the balls to pull it off. > > Any questions? > > Good – Because it don’t look like anybody has the balls to do it. > > I'm going to show "them" what happens when you piss off an Englishman. > > On Apr 13, 6:21 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Vic- great that the problem of hum is being taken seriously now and thanks > > for highlghting your insights into BPL > > This is always worth a re read as it's hard to take in in one go. > > However, there is no connection between the general case you make and any > > individual - UNLESS you can give the details of exposure, reaction to local > > KNOWN conditions of BPL etc. > > Restating the precursors to a condition doesn't make it apply everywhere. > > It wouldn't get anywhere in a court of law. Surely you know this? > > > On Friday, 13 April 2012 13:47:10 UTC+1, Vic wrote: > > > > Here ya go, being looked at right now by SADS associations worldwide. > > > And Josh I don't believe you've read any evidence that has been put > > > together. > > > > Wherever BPL/B-PLC is operational in the power lines there is > > > REACTANCE at the mains frequency; either 50Hz or 60HZ dependent on > > > country. > > > In the USA, at 60Hz/120V, this reactance power level is between 60 and > > > 80dBC (observed). In countries with 50Hz/230 or 240V this reactance > > > power level is between 60 and 95dBC (observed). These are statements > > > of fact and were taken from power spectrum sample data. > > > A reactance power level of 60dBC equates to approximately **1KW/cm2; > > > 80dBC to approximately **10KW/cm2; 95dBC to approximately **40KW/cm2. > > > All of the above power levels are calculated at ground level under a > > > power line – Approximately 18 feet high/distance. > > > ** Using the formula: 10log10 (P X 1/0.001) = (nn)dBm (milliwatts) > > > A quick look at REACTANCE resultant subharmonic frequencies compared > > > to heartbeat/pulse rate: > > > 50Hz Octave > > > Note 60Hz Octave Note > > > Low 48.56Hz G1 > > > 58.2705Hz Bb1 > > > > High 53.112Hz A1/Ab1 > > > 63.735Hz B1 > > > > Low 1.44bps 1.73bps > > > High 3.735bps > > > 3.112bps > > > > Low 72bpm > > > 103.77bpm > > > > High 224.1bpm > > > 186.72bpm > > > > Key: Hz = Hertz bps = Heartbeats per Second bpm = > > > Heartbeats per > > > minute > > > > The below text is taken from the National Emergency Medical > > > Association website: > > >http://www.nemahealth.org/programs/healthcare/heart_rate_pulse.htm > > > Resting Heart Rate anywhere in the range of 60 - 90 is considered in > > > the normal range. Your Heart Rate will fluctuate a lot depending on > > > such factors as your activity level and stress level. If however, your > > > pulse is consistently above 90, you should consult with your > > > physician. > > > Example: > > > If you count 12 beats in the span of 10 seconds, multiply 12 X 6 = 72. > > > This means your Heart Rate or pulse, is 72 (or 72 beats per minute). > > > Target Heart Rate for an Athlete > > > Take 220 and subtract your age. This will give you a predicted maximum > > > heart rate. > > > For example, if you are 22 years old, subtract 22 from 220 (220 - 22 = > > > 198). This means that your maximum physiological limit as to how fast > > > your heart should beat is 198 beats per minute. > > > 27 years old: 220 – 27 = 193bpm, 33 years old: 220 – 33 = 187bpm, etc. > > > Conclusion: > > > The above chart shows that BPL/B-PLC derived mains-electricity > > > Reactance subharmonic frequencies and human heartbeat rate, across the > > > board, have very similar properties. > > > Regardless of how you compare the above data, the fact remains; should > > > someone be in the vicinity of a medium and above strength BPL/B-PLC > > > derived mains electricity reactance there is a high probability that > > > their heartbeat would be force-modulated to the high-power subharmonic > > > pulses. > > > In medical terms this is known as Ventricular fibrillation (V-fib or > > > VF) and is a condition in which there is uncoordinated contraction of > > > the cardiac muscle of the ventricles in the heart making them quiver > > > rather than contract properly. Ventricular fibrillation is the most > > > commonly identified arrhythmia in cardiac arrest patients. > > > > On Apr 13, 7:10 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I agree Josh. Unless there is direct evidence of previous problems with > > > EM > > > > effects etc. it won't help our case to blame any unfortunate young death > > > on > > > > this without data that would make it a high grade suspect > > > > > The information is there to kill this "thing". Why isn't anyone doing > > > > > > anything? > > > > > > There are a lot of groups of people taking out legal complaints over > > > > > in the States now that they know what "it" is. Others who were going > > > > > after stopping the so-called "smart" meters have swung BPL info into > > > > > their litigation too. > > > > > > C'mon everybody. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
