Now long has it taken to convince ANYBODY on here? It doesn't matter what the level is that you "hear" it, it's STILL hitting you full pelt.
I am not going to even try to inform anyone on how to stop it hitting on a "in your home" level - I am not going to put myself through that again. So folks, now what are you going to do? Do nothing and you will die early, which is what "they" want you to do. You all have the data to do something positve. It's been checked and double, triple checked the world over, several times. The formula in THE MATH post is simply a POWER DENSITY calcualtion - It's like sticking your head in a bucket of water. Take it out and you live, leave it in there and you die. I'm waiting for folks to put 2 and 2 together and start stating, "I go into a store/shop and start to shake. I have to get out quick. I drive past an intersection and the same thing happens. OMG what is happening?" YOU KNOW ALREADY. I know what "it" is. I know how to stop it. Lots of people that don't know anything try to tell me that I'm wrong. Fine - I'll live. On Apr 18, 6:45 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe those proponents of all round screening of bedrooms have a point then > Vic? > it would be very expensive if it turned not to work- but I'd like to know > if anyone has tried this... > My Hum is not so intrusive, generally to warrant this work- but many > posters would benefit if it works even half well. > This would also clarify the amount of breakthrough radiation in the average > home- assuming it has mains power installed. > > > > On Monday, 16 April 2012 00:49:32 UTC+1, Vic wrote: > > > Inverse square law doesn't apply when your problem is in your home > > wiring - Now does it? > > > Harmonics in power lines have always been there - Now there are some > > more, only these are high-power harmonics - 128 or 256X > > > It's piggy backed alright - Ripped from the power lines by BPL > > emissions and into your matress springs..... > > > On Apr 15, 5:28 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > OK- Lets bring up another issue- Inverse square law. > > > All the spurious output generated at UHF is radiated from a point > > source. > > > Each discrete you would claim to be synchronous by virtue of the > > harmonic > > > progressions inherent in the fundamental driver source- the power lines > > > and associated piggy back carriers at UHF. > > > It seems too much to think that, at ever increasing loss by attenuation, > > > waves could penetrate human tissue and pass underground at significant > > > levels to cause harm or hum, other than realy close by. > > > What I suggest is needed, apart from technical assertions, is power > > level > > > spectrum densities that pin down the culprit you highlight actually in > > the > > > vicinity of effects. > > > I'm not saying you're wrong Vic, anywhere- just a plug at keeping the > > > science tied to real events that a court of law would expect to see. I > > > think Josh came from this angle also. > > > 'They're' not going to admit to anything without 'prima face' evidence. > > > Yes, I admit the technical depth of your paper is over my head which is > > why > > > I take a man on the street approach -with a wider view to push for, as > > I'd > > > like to see you win on this.. > > > > On Friday, 13 April 2012 05:08:24 UTC+1, Vic wrote: > > > > > Another young guy dropped dead tonight on a sports field near London, > > > > UK. He was 22 years old. > > > > > I sent both of my documents to his parents and to the sports club. > > > > > Anyone in the UK send anything? I doubt it. > > > > > The information is there to kill this "thing". Why isn't anyone doing > > > > anything? > > > > > There are a lot of groups of people taking out legal complaints over > > > > in the States now that they know what "it" is. Others who were going > > > > after stopping the so-called "smart" meters have swung BPL info into > > > > their litigation too. > > > > > C'mon everybody. > On Monday, 16 April 2012 00:49:32 UTC+1, Vic wrote: > > > Inverse square law doesn't apply when your problem is in your home > > wiring - Now does it? > > > Harmonics in power lines have always been there - Now there are some > > more, only these are high-power harmonics - 128 or 256X > > > It's piggy backed alright - Ripped from the power lines by BPL > > emissions and into your matress springs..... > > > On Apr 15, 5:28 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > OK- Lets bring up another issue- Inverse square law. > > > All the spurious output generated at UHF is radiated from a point > > source. > > > Each discrete you would claim to be synchronous by virtue of the > > harmonic > > > progressions inherent in the fundamental driver source- the power lines > > > and associated piggy back carriers at UHF. > > > It seems too much to think that, at ever increasing loss by attenuation, > > > waves could penetrate human tissue and pass underground at significant > > > levels to cause harm or hum, other than realy close by. > > > What I suggest is needed, apart from technical assertions, is power > > level > > > spectrum densities that pin down the culprit you highlight actually in > > the > > > vicinity of effects. > > > I'm not saying you're wrong Vic, anywhere- just a plug at keeping the > > > science tied to real events that a court of law would expect to see. I > > > think Josh came from this angle also. > > > 'They're' not going to admit to anything without 'prima face' evidence. > > > Yes, I admit the technical depth of your paper is over my head which is > > why > > > I take a man on the street approach -with a wider view to push for, as > > I'd > > > like to see you win on this.. > > > > On Friday, 13 April 2012 05:08:24 UTC+1, Vic wrote: > > > > > Another young guy dropped dead tonight on a sports field near London, > > > > UK. He was 22 years old. > > > > > I sent both of my documents to his parents and to the sports club. > > > > > Anyone in the UK send anything? I doubt it. > > > > > The information is there to kill this "thing". Why isn't anyone doing > > > > anything? > > > > > There are a lot of groups of people taking out legal complaints over > > > > in the States now that they know what "it" is. Others who were going > > > > after stopping the so-called "smart" meters have swung BPL info into > > > > their litigation too. > > > > > C'mon everybody. > On Monday, 16 April 2012 00:49:32 UTC+1, Vic wrote: > > > Inverse square law doesn't apply when your problem is in your home > > wiring - Now does it? > > > Harmonics in power lines have always been there - Now there are some > > more, only these are high-power harmonics - 128 or 256X > > > It's piggy backed alright - Ripped from the power lines by BPL > > emissions and into your matress springs..... > > > On Apr 15, 5:28 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > OK- Lets bring up another issue- Inverse square law. > > > All the spurious output generated at UHF is radiated from a point > > source. > > > Each discrete you would claim to be synchronous by virtue of the > > harmonic > > > progressions inherent in the fundamental driver source- the power lines > > > and associated piggy back carriers at UHF. > > > It seems too much to think that, at ever increasing loss by attenuation, > > > waves could penetrate human tissue and pass underground at significant > > > levels to cause harm or hum, other than realy close by. > > > What I suggest is needed, apart from technical assertions, is power > > level > > > spectrum densities that pin down the culprit you highlight actually in > > the > > > vicinity of effects. > > > I'm not saying you're wrong Vic, anywhere- just a plug at keeping the > > > science tied to real events that a court of law would expect to see. I > > > think Josh came from this angle also. > > > 'They're' not going to admit to anything without 'prima face' evidence. > > > Yes, I admit the technical depth of your paper is over my head which is > > why > > > I take a man on the street approach -with a wider view to push for, as > > I'd > > > like to see you win on this.. > > > > On Friday, 13 April 2012 05:08:24 UTC+1, Vic wrote: > > > > > Another young guy dropped dead tonight on a sports field near London, > > > > UK. He was 22 years old. > > > > > I sent both of my documents to his parents and to the sports club. > > > > > Anyone in the UK send anything? I doubt it. > > > > > The information is there to kill this "thing". Why isn't anyone doing > > > > anything? > > > > > There are a lot of groups of people taking out legal complaints over > > > > in the States now that they know what "it" is. Others who were going > > > > after stopping the so-called "smart" meters have swung BPL info into > > > > their litigation too. > > > > > C'mon everybody. > On Monday, 16 April 2012 00:49:32 UTC+1, Vic wrote: > > > Inverse square law doesn't apply when your problem is in your home > > wiring - Now does it? > > > Harmonics in power lines have always been there - Now there are some > > more, only these are high-power harmonics - 128 or 256X > > > It's piggy backed alright - Ripped from the power lines by BPL > > emissions and into your matress springs..... > > > On Apr 15, 5:28 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > OK- Lets bring up another issue- Inverse square law. > > > All the spurious output generated at UHF is radiated from a point > > source. > > > Each discrete you would claim to be synchronous by virtue of the > > harmonic > > > progressions inherent in the fundamental driver source- the power lines > > > and associated piggy back carriers at UHF. > > > It seems too much to think that, at ever increasing loss by attenuation, > > > waves could penetrate human tissue and pass underground at significant > > > levels to cause harm or hum, other than realy close by. > > > What I suggest is needed, apart from technical assertions, is power > > level > > > spectrum densities that pin down the culprit you highlight actually in > > the > > > vicinity of effects. > > > I'm not saying you're wrong Vic, anywhere- just a plug at keeping the > > > science tied to real events that a court of law would expect to see. I > > > think Josh came from this angle also. > > > 'They're' not going to admit to anything without 'prima face' evidence. > > > Yes, I admit the technical depth of your paper is over my head which is > > why > > > I take a man on the street approach -with a wider view to push for, as > > I'd > > > like to see you win on this.. > > > > On Friday, 13 April 2012 05:08:24 UTC+1, Vic wrote: > > > > > Another young guy dropped dead tonight on a sports field near London, > > > > UK. He was 22 years old. > > > > > I sent both of my documents to his parents and to the sports club. > > > > > Anyone in the UK send anything? I doubt it. > > > > > The information is there to kill this "thing". Why isn't anyone doing > > > > anything? > > > > > There are a lot of groups of people taking out legal complaints over > > > > in the States now that they know what "it" is. Others who were going > > > > after stopping the so-called "smart" meters have swung BPL info into > > > > their litigation too. > > ... > > read more » -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
