Jeff Squyres, le Fri 26 Mar 2010 14:15:50 -0400, a écrit : > On Mar 26, 2010, at 2:01 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: > > > > I like "Proc" instead of "P" even for the non-v output. :-) > > > > I am not against it, but I don't remember the reason for the initial > > change. Maybe because "processor" is confusing for some people (logical > > vs physical socket) ? > > Oh crap. I think you're right. And I think I even asked for that. ;-) > > Hmm. > > Is it a crime to use the full word "Processor"? At least on my machine, the > output width is still far less than 80 characters, so the full word should be > no problem. But I don't know if there are other strange topologies out there > that would take up more space...? (it certainly would in the graphic > output...)
The graphical output is a reason to at least have a function that returns P, yes, else the output is very large. Samuel
