On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 22:05, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: > On Mar 26, 2010, at 4:16 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> > Is it a crime to use the full word "Processor"? At least on my machine, >> > the output width is still far less than 80 characters, so the full word >> > should be no problem. But I don't know if there are other strange >> > topologies out there that would take up more space...? (it certainly >> > would in the graphic output...) >> >> The graphical output is a reason to at least have a function that >> returns P, yes, else the output is very large. > > How about "Processor" in the text outputs, and a shorter version in the > graphic output? > > Shorten "processor" to: > > Prcssr > Prcsr > Procr > Procsr > ...?
For htop I use just "CPU". Bert
