Jeff Squyres, le Fri 26 Mar 2010 17:05:39 -0400, a écrit :
> On Mar 26, 2010, at 4:16 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> 
> > > Is it a crime to use the full word "Processor"?  At least on my machine, 
> > > the output width is still far less than 80 characters, so the full word 
> > > should be no problem.  But I don't know if there are other strange 
> > > topologies out there that would take up more space...?  (it certainly 
> > > would in the graphic output...)
> > 
> > The graphical output is a reason to at least have a function that
> > returns P, yes, else the output is very large.
> 
> How about "Processor" in the text outputs, and a shorter version in the 
> graphic output?
> 
> Shorten "processor" to:
> 
> Prcssr
> Prcsr
> Procr
> Procsr

That's still very large. We are going toward dozens of cores on each
sockets, we really need to keep them small :)

Samuel

Reply via email to