Jeff Squyres, le Fri 26 Mar 2010 17:05:39 -0400, a écrit : > On Mar 26, 2010, at 4:16 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Is it a crime to use the full word "Processor"? At least on my machine, > > > the output width is still far less than 80 characters, so the full word > > > should be no problem. But I don't know if there are other strange > > > topologies out there that would take up more space...? (it certainly > > > would in the graphic output...) > > > > The graphical output is a reason to at least have a function that > > returns P, yes, else the output is very large. > > How about "Processor" in the text outputs, and a shorter version in the > graphic output? > > Shorten "processor" to: > > Prcssr > Prcsr > Procr > Procsr
That's still very large. We are going toward dozens of cores on each sockets, we really need to keep them small :) Samuel
