Jeff Squyres wrote: > On Mar 26, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > >> That's still very large. We are going toward dozens of cores on each >> sockets, we really need to keep them small :) >> > > Fair enough. How about still just keeping "P" in the graphic output, then? > But "processor" in the prettyprint? >
IIRC, somebody said "PU" (for "processing unit") could be a good solution. Otherwise, I am ok with "Proc" or "Processor", with a small preference for the former. By the way, this is also what hwloc_type_string() would return. Unless we keep it unchanged and just hack lstopo to use its own stringified type name ? Brice
